Some students and school officials have claimed that the free exercise
clause of the first amendment allows them to organize prayer sessions in
public schools. how does this interpretation conflict with the establishment
clause?
o
a. spending time praying in school may prevent students from
focusing on meeting academic standards.
o
b. many feel that public institutions such as schools should allow
people to express whatever religious views they wish.
o
c. school prayer may be seen as an example of the government
interfering too much in education.
o
d. organized prayer in public schools could be seen as the
government endorsing a particular religion.

Organized prayer in public schools could be seen as the  government endorsing a particular religion is conflict with the establishment  clause.

D. Organized prayer in public schools could be seen as the  government endorsing a particular religion.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court has since quite a while ago held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment prohibits school-supported supplication or strict teaching. Sorted out supplication in the government-funded school setting, regardless of whether in the study hall or at a school-supported occasion, is unlawful.

While it is naturally passable for government-funded schools to educate about religion, it is unlawful for state-funded schools and their representatives to watch strict occasions, advance strict convictions, or practice religion. So Public school authorities do, obviously, have an established right to express their strict convictions time permitting.

Along these lines, sorting out petition sessions in a government-funded school can hurt the Establishment Clause that restricts the condition of supporting religions, since state-funded schools are financed by the legislature.

n arraignment is not a hearing to determine guilt or innocence. it is usually a criminal defendant's first appearance in court