Which three parts of this excerpt from mark twain's "the £1,000,000 bank-note" contain hyperbole?

"i may use your name! your name--think of it! man, (1)they'll flock in droves, (2)these rich londoners; (3)they'll fight for that stock! i'm a made man, (4)i'm a made man forever, and i'll never forget you as long as i live! "
(5)in less than twenty-four hours london was abuzz! i hadn't anything to do, day after day, but sit at home, and say to all comers:
"yes; i told him to refer to me. i know the man, and i know the mine. his character is above reproach, (6)and the mine is worth far more than he asks for it."
meantime (7)i spent all my evenings at the minister's with portia. i didn't say a word to her about the mine; i saved it for a surprise.

The book the lord of the rings by j r r tolkien, in which the main character must go on a journey to destroys magic ring, is an expample of which plot archetype

Read the passage from sugar changed the world. sugar is a taste we all want, a taste we all crave. people throughout the planet everywhere have been willing to do anything, anything at all, to get that touch of sweetness. we even know exactly how thrilling it was to taste sugar for the first time. when the lewis and clark expedition met up with the shoshone, who had little previous contact with old world products, sacagawea gave a tiny piece of sugar to a chief. he loved it, saying it was "the best thing he had ever tasted." sugar created a hunger, a need, which swept from one corner of the world to another, bringing the most terrible misery and destruction, but then, too, the most inspiring ideas of liberty. sugar changed the world. we begin that story with a man who could never know enough. how does the conclusion of the prologue support the authors’ purpose? select two options. it introduces the topic that will be addressed next. it provides information about the authors. it states why the topic is relevant to readers. it cites sources the authors used in the text. it explains how the authors came to study the subject.

How did the language of the gettysburg address differ from the language in the secondary source about this speech?