In my opinion i think artless proof is more important than artistic proof. artless proof is a factual arguement where you may have pre-exisisting physical evidence on hand to back up your arguement. artistic proof can be can be less assuring because you're creating an arguement based off of little evidence to back it up. when you have facts and statistics to back up an arguement of yours like a witness for example you're more likely to win an arguement opposed to someone who tries to come up with an arguement that could be a lie.

In at least 150 words, discuss the comparison described in the figurative language and how the connotative language reinforces the symbol. certainly the utmost rim of my first dome was filled with the tumultuous impression of soldiers marching to death for freedom's sake, of pioneers streaming westward to establish self-government in yet another sovereign state. only the great dome of st. peter's itself has ever clutched my heart as did that modest curve which had sequestered from infinitude in a place small enough for my child's mind, the courage and endurance which i could not comprehend so long as it was lost in "the void of unresponsible space" under the vaulting sky itself.