My brother who is a superb actor will audition tomorrow for a film role. how should the writer punctuate the underlined nonrestrictive clause in order to emphasize it? a) my brother: who is a superb actor will audition tomorrow for a film role. b) my brother; who is a superb actor; will audition tomorrow for a film role. c) my brother who is a superb actor, will audition tomorrow for a film role. d) my brother—who is a superb actor—will audition tomorrow for a film role.

D) My brother—who is a superb actor—will audition tomorrow for a film role.

Explanation:

Non restrictive clauses are those unnecessary words or groups of words/ clauses that does not add any value or meaning to the sentence. They can also be omitted for they serve no use in the sentence. It adds an extra information about the sentence but which have no significance.

With a non restrictive clause in the sentence, the use of a comma before and after the clause is mandatory. But since the options provided gives no such option, the best rewritten with the use of the em dash.

Thus, the final correctly punctuated sentence will be

My brother—who is a superb actor—will audition tomorrow for a film role.

me  

what's the sales price

1. this would be first person. it would be like "i walked home from school today" they are the narrator of the story and is a character as well.

2. first person because they used the word "i" in the quote.

3. i'm really not sure about this one i'm really sorry i never read it so i wouldn't know how to answer it. 

4. it would be character vs. society because everyone he meets there is always a conflict of some sort because he's stuck in his daydream.

5. it would be sadness at the loss of youth because the title itself tells us it's about age so it couldn't be about regret. and the tone just sounds sad, not angry. 

i hope this !