Read the argument below and answer the question that follows.

this book is popular with my male friends. therefore, i think you, as a guy, will probably like it as well.

is the argument above inductive or deductive? why?

a. it is inductive because it is based on personal experience.
b. it is deductive because it is based on a personal experience.
c. it is inductive because it is based on a general principle.
d. it is deductive because it is based on a general principle.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

the answer is c. hope this