subject
English, 15.10.2019 10:30 megamorph

We must see to it that the immeasurable pain of the holocaust is not dehumanized, that it is not examined clinically and dispassionately, that its significance is not lost on this generation or any future generation. though it is now a dry scar, we cannot let the bleeding wound be forgotten. only when it is personalized will it be real enough to play a role in the decisions we make. those victims who cannot be with us today do a vital service to mankind by being remembered. but we must be their vessel of remembrance. this reunion is part of our duty to them.

–speech to holocaust survivors,
ronald reagan

besides parallelism, what other type of appeal does reagan use in this passage?

how does the technique support reagan’s message?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
What is the narrators main conflict in this passage
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
Lisa works 7 hours a day, 7 days a week. how many hours does lisa work in 6 weeks
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:00
“tell me o swan, your ancient tale” by kabir “the swan” by rilke “spanish dancer” by rilke “your laughter” by pablo neruda “birthplace” by shaffarzadeh “it’s this way” by nazim hikmet “counting small-boned bodies” by robert bly choose two poems that you would like to write about. analyze each poem. study the perspective, or point of view, of the speaker in each of the two poems that you select for this assignment. consider these questions: who is the speaker in each of these poems? what is the speaker’s tone? is there a conflict? is there a message? what does each of the poems have in common? what is different about each of the poems? which literary devices are used in the poems? are these literary devices found in both of the poems? what does the speaker hope to achieve in each of the poems? how are these achievements/goals been met? directions: using the two poems of your choosing, write a clear, concise, two hundred and fifty word essay that compares and contrasts the two poems. make sure you include at least two of the following to support your thesis: tone, point of view, literary devices, and meter.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:20
()activityconstruct an argument about a topic, theme, or idea that you read about in william shakespeare's romeo and juliet, act ii or act iii. make sure you create a central claim for your argument that is debatable. provide textual evidence from the play to support your argument.my analysis juliet shows maturity by putting their needs before hers. after juliet has arranged her 'death' with friar lawrence, she is an emotionally awoken woman who will do anything to be with the one she loves. "and i will do it without fear or doubt, to live an unstained wife to my sweet love". juliet faces her fears and trusts in god and friar lawrence. she is forced to use trickery in order to stay true to dear romeo. this showed remarkable courage. before she takes the potion she uses a soliloquy that confronts all her fears. she speaks in blank verse showing the seriousness of the situation. when juliet awakes to see a lifeless romeo lying beside her, juliet's maturity and loyalty takes over and she takes the decision to choose eternity over the present. the quotation "then i'll be brief. o happy dagger! this is my sheath; there rust, and let me die." shows the quickness and determination of juliet's death. during the period of a few days juliet matures into a committed and reliable woman and wife, capable of taking decisions without the of others. shakespeare shows this by clearly stating the different stages that happen and by making everything occur in a short period of time.part cwrite a 300-word essay arguing the thesis of your analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
We must see to it that the immeasurable pain of the holocaust is not dehumanized, that it is not exa...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 07:53
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 07:53
Questions on the website: 13722361