Hey guys i need a little hep with evaluating a group discussion and im not a very good writer but this is a very big grade i just need a nice paragraph with evidence on the topic why walking is better than a car ride

Walking is better than a car ride because walking has various health benefits, it does not cause air pollution, it does not cause noise pollution either, it does not contribute to traffic issues, it is the cheapest method of commute, and one is less likely to meet any serious accidents while walking.

Explanation: Walking has been counted in the best exercises for the body for ages. Doctors and physicians prescribe walking over using cars because walking helps regulate a number of functions in the body and also helps reduce excess fat. From the conversation point of view, walking should be preferred because it is environment-friendly. Walking does not leave a carbon footprint and causes no harm to the surrounding. More people walking would mean less vehicular traffic on the road, and ultimately more convenience in managing the traffic. Other than being healthy, walking is also 'safe' as a pedestrian is less likely to meet a deadly road accident than a car driver is. Moreover, walking costs way less than driving a car does.

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

the answer is the speaker views both as possessions that reflect his importance.