Is colin's evidence relevant to his claim?

read colin's argument.

nowadays, one often hears complaints that drones can

invade people's privacy. but this is not true. flying drones

is actually a sport. it requires coordination and technical

skills like other sports. in fact, there should be professional

drone-flying leagues. if people recognized this sport, they

would no longer complain about where and when drone

owners flew their drones.

yes, because he gives evidence that flying drones is a

sport.

yes, because it is on the subject of people owning and

flying drones.

no, because he only gives his own opinion rather than

providing evidence.

no, because it is about flying drones being a sport, not

about privacy issues.

b. failure at least that one seems the most negative out of all of the answers provided pls correct me if i'm wrong. : ))

i believe the answer is: b. mr. head had a long, tube-like face with a rounded open jaw and a short depressed nose.

this is because in the un-revised sentence it said that mr. heads face was long and tube-like, and he had a rounded open jaw. this is not a very grammatically correct because of how it seems to drag on with the and, replaced with, with, makes it sound more fluent in the description.

that is based on your opinion not an answer someone can just give you unless you want to lie on your opinion. no offense wasn't trying to be rude. tip: use words like instead of don't put do not and you get what i mean

ae4