How would you rate these valedictory speeches. consider the lecture's tips as well as your own experience and preferences to write a critique of the two speeches. what did you (not) like about them? what worked for the authors? what didn't work? do you think they connected with their audiences? did they write with an appropriate tone, mood, and voice? do the speeches reflect the classes' accomplishments, experiences, and expectations for the future? be sure to explain your answers with examples from the texts

Find the center and the radius of the circle with the equation: x^-2x+y^2+4y+1=0

Which of the following best demonstrate a strong conflict? a. catherine enjoyed painting, and was able to practice her art every tuesday. b. leanne loved camping, but it was a lot of work. she had to start gathering her supplies weeks before the big trip. c. kate wanted to be a fitness instructor. she worked hard to become a certified aerobics teacher. d. russell knew that if he did not get a good grade on his test, then he would fail the class and not be allowed to graduate.

In the real world, feldman learned to settle for less than 95 percent. he came to consider a company “honest” if its payment rate was above 90 percent. he considered a rate between 80 and 90 percent “annoying but tolerable.” if a company habitually paid below 80 percent, feldman might post a hectoring note, like this one: the cost of bagels has gone up dramatically since the beginning of the year. unfortunately, the number of bagels that disappear without being paid for has also gone up. don’t let that continue. i don’t imagine that you would teach your children to cheat, so why do it yourselves? the excerpt serves as which type of support for the authors’ argument? a claim an example a conclusion a counterclaim