Would you ever surf again if this happened to you? bethany did not quit after her accident. the doctors said her strength and excellent health her life. just months after she almost lost her life ,she was surfing again. that same year she earned a spot on the u. s national surf team. bethany also won an award for the best comeback athlete .people around. the world read about bethany’a accident they were inspired by the way she overcome the loss of her arm “people i do not even know come up to me i guess they think i’m the symbol of courage,” she said. “ one thing has not changed and that is how i feel when i am riding a wave. it’s like , here i am. i am still here”.since her attack ,bethany has won many surfing contests. but surfing is only part. of. her life now. she has written a book and gone on tv shows. she also travels to cities around the world to speak with people about not giving up. in 2005, she visited injured soldiers. some of these soldiers had lost an arm or leg in the was in iraq. her messages was simple me quit ? never”

Which best explains how the viewpoint in the greenberg interview differed from that in the informational text on thurgood marshall. a. the informational article provides an insider's view of the brown vs board of education case; the perspective of the greenberg interview is more distant.

Plz change it i can not change this sentences .

The arctic national wildlife refuge is home to caribou, moose, musk oxen, wolves, foxes, grizzlies, polar bears and migratory birds. leaders in the oil industry believe the refuge is the perfect site for the “environmentally sensitive exploration” of oil. environmentalists are wondering: what will become of the wildlife? president george w. bush, oil-industry leaders and others believe that americans will benefit from the oil that lies under the snow-filled surface of the refuge. in their opinion, the oil will reduce high fuel prices and decrease our need for oil from other countries. i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? americans are the largest consumers of oil. instead of drilling for oil, we should decrease our need for foreign oil simply by using less. we must all work together to cut back on the oil we use in order to preserve the wildlife of the arctic national wildlife refuge. what type of argument is used in this paragraph? i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? a. appeal to emotion c. appeal to logic b. bandwagon d. none of the above select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d