The question is attached on a jpg, and the writing is written down below.

newspapers are just one way that we retrieve information in this highly technological age of the internet, cable television, and twitter. it’s old school to say the least. and though fewer people are subscribing to hardcopy newspapers than ever before, they are still a reliable source of what’s going on in the world. the journalistic “code of ethics,” which varies from publication to publication, values the principles of truthfulness, accuracy, objectivity, and fairness. in other words, we should be able to trust that the facts have been checked and that the reporting is fair; if it’s not, we can hold the paper accountable.

with so many newspapers to choose from, how do you decide which to read? it’s kind of like being in a candy store. all of the contents are similar—sweet and sugary—but which do you choose? well, a great deal of attention is spent cultivating an excellent reputation over many years of delivering a great product—on one hand cadbury or nestle and on the other the new york times or the washington post. another heaping of effort is devoted to the design and layout of the product; the wrapper for the candy and the front page and beyond for the newspaper. we are indeed a visual culture: anything eye-catching definitely stands out and has a better chance of landing in our hands. and what better way to attract a reader’s attention than a top-notch front page?

98 points for your troubles plus a brainiest.

the most ethic and honorable thing for the newspaper to do are:

be completely transparent in reporting about the company’s attempt to trade favors.

contact other construction companies to tell them about the situation.

these two options are the most ethic because both promote the market fair course, by telling the other competitors about the company attempt to get ahead in the market by trading favors, the market is guaranteed equality and justice in the trading of goods and services.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

dioneo just might be like one of your friends. he is a good looking guy that can say whatever he want and get away with it. he's brings life because he can sing and play the lute. he is also dangerous because he can convince you to do anything for him because his wit is so sharp, you can not resist. dioneo is determined to take the next logical step and initiate a small campaign for freedom of speech. he does this by begging to be released from telling stories that conform to the daily theme. then, during his own time, he chooses a themes that are scandalous and he gets the response he expects.