Item 1in the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button. original sourceanalysis of patterns in time (apt) is a method for gathering information about observable phenomena such that probabilities of temporal patterns of events can be estimated empirically. if appropriate sampling strategies are employed, temporal patterns can be predicted from apt results. finally, apt is compared to the linear models approach and event history analysis. the major difference is that in apt there is no mathematical model assumed to characterize relations among variables. in apt the model is the temporal pattern being investigated. references: frick, t. (1990). analysis of patterns in time (apt): a method of recording and quantifying temporal relations in education. american educational research journal, 27(1), 180-204.student versionapt is an empirical approach to observing and coding phenomena by using mutually exclusive and exhaustive categories within multiple classifications (frick, 1990). once these data have been collected, researchers specify apt queries to calculate the probability of joint and/or sequential patterns of interest. in effect, researchers create measures of temporal patterns by counting the occurrences of these coded patterns. according to frick, analysis of patterns in time is different from the linear models approach of measuring variables separately and using statistics to analyze their relations. references: frick, t. (1990). analysis of patterns in time (apt): a method of recording and quantifying temporal relations in education. american educational research journal, 27(1), 180-204.which of the following is true for the student version above? word-for-word plagiarismparaphrasing plagiarismthis is not plagiarismhints

I believe that the best answer to the question: In the case below, the original source material is given along with the sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking on the appropriate radio button, would be: This is not plagiarism.

Explanation:

Plagiarism is considered not just the copying word for word of another author´s text, but also appropriating the ideas and concepts of that other author through paraphrasing. This means that when matches of words, concepts, or ideas, between two texts, surpasses a certain level, it is considered plagiarism, being because the person using an original text as reference literally copied the words of the original, or because instead of using his own ideas, he used those of the original text, but with a different set of words (paraphrasing plagiarism). The rules to determine the presence of plagiarism are very strict and also make reference to the wrong citation of in-text citations, and the proper reference in the words-cited page. However, after analyzing these two texts you cannot find above a 5% match, and that only in the reference page. The student literally understood the concept given in the original text, an aside from universal concepts that do not have alternative choices, he did use his own words, and cited properly those that matched the original text. This is why this is not considered plagiarism of any form.

hey there

use of language is very important in order to write in a good way. each literary genre has its different exploitation of language and, therefore, many differences and similarities can emerge. shakespeare's work (romeo and juliet) is a sample of a drama. its language is full of dialogue to describe the beauty of first love in people; everything it's pink color. it briefly describes fictional scenes and situations. on the other hand, the calypso borealis, by john muirs, it's narrative essay: its language is full of descriptions to describe an experience, a real experience. hyperbole is not used as in drama genre. he falls in love with discovering a real place and his direct feelings.

hope this !

f yes, , mark brainliest : )

have a good night.

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.