Who entertains hrothgar and his thanes after the victory over grandel

Explanation:

A king is a protector for his people. He is chosen by his people as a man who is strong, reliable, powerful, trustworthy, etc. A king is someone people can trust to defend them, to conquer new territories for them, to provide them with everything they might need to live comfortably, and to rule them fairly. In order to do that, he needs to be strong enough and have a powerful army beside him.

A thane has to be loyal to his lord or king. He shouldn't disobey him, he shouldn't betray him or do him any harm. He should follow his orders, be by his side when necessary, and provide advice and/or people to fight for him. Beowulf, for example, is a thane to King Hrothgar, and he came to his aid when Grendel was killing his men.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war