Based on the schenck v. united states case, when might it be acceptable for the government to restrict information
released by the press?
a. the government can never restrict information released by the press.
b. the government can only restrict information when it could be harmful to an individual's reputation.
c. the government can only restrict information released when practicing prior restraint.
d. the government can only restrict information that could present an immediate threat to security or the public.

Returning from vietnam, we were indeed given a parade. crowds of screaming people waving signs — not just on one road, one day. no, they were everywhere. every day. on the streets, on the television, on the radio. a hot, angry tangle of shaking fists and ugly words that threatened us like a monster with a hundred heads. our country had chewed us up and spit us out, and now we were being treated as if it were our fault. what is one way the author's use of language contributes to the tone of this passage? a. the use of figurative language creates a feeling of resentment. b. the phrase "hot, angry tangle" is used sarcastically to create irony. c. the word "parade" is used sarcastically to create a lighthearted mood. d. the parallelism draws attention to the confusion of those returning.