Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button.
original source material
student version
when top-down major changes are initiated in organizations, people tend to assume that training is needed to members of the organization change their behavior. while training might , if people in the organization lack commitment to accept the changes, they still might not do what management wants them to do.
original version
major changes within organizations are usually initiated by those who are in power. such decision-makers sponsor the change and then appoint someone else - perhaps the director of training - to be responsible for implementing and managing change. whether the appointed change agent is in training development or not, there is often the implicit assumption that training will "solve the problem." and, indeed, training may solve part of the the result is that potentially effective innovations suffer misuse, or even no use, in the hands of uncommitted users.
which of the following is true for the student version above?
(a) word-for-word plagiarism
(b) paraphrasing plagiarism
(c) this is not plagiarism

The answer would be option B "Paraphrasing plagiarism." It would not be option A because if the student version was word for word plagiarism then it would look exactly like the original version. It isn't option C because I can still see some similarities between the two versions but one is a simplified version of the other. It is option B because paraphrasing plagiarism is copying but reducing the work into more simpler terms.

Hope this helps.

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.

answer: e

explanation: