Which excerpt from john updike's "the brown chest" includes a historical reference for the story? a. so he was , one winter day, two years after their wayward drive north, to have gordon call and ask if he could come look at the furniture in the barn. he had a job, he said, or almost, and was moving into a bigger place, out from the city. he would be bringing a friend, he vaguely added. b. for in this house, the house that he inhabited as if he would never live in any other, there were popular cheerful places, where the radio played and the legs of grown-ups went back and forth, and there were haunted bad places, like the coal bin behind the furnace, and the attic with its spiders and smell of old carpet, . . c. the chest, on that day of moving, had been set in the new attic, which was smaller than the other, and less frightening, perhaps because gaps in the cedar-shingled roof let dabs of daylight in. when the roof was being repaired, the whole space was thrown open to the weather, . . d. he found the place in the chest lid, near one of the little dark hinges, where a split had occurred, and with a few carefully driven nails repaired the damage well enough. he could not blame the boy, who was named gordon, after his paternal grandfather, the onetime football player crouching for his picture in some sunny autumn when harding was president.

theres no poem plesae include that

xjcbxjbv bcxbvjdbjvbcjvjdvbvbdkc

can you share the passage so i can answer the question : )

yes it did. that's been proven time and again. i used to be an elementary school teacher myself, and i worked with thousands of kids with cerebral palsy across the nation and in canada. what i observed was that children with dyslexia were struggling to read and learn. it was a serious issue that impacted teachers all over the country, but it was so often ignored and denied.

and children with disabilities – children who have learning disabilities – they got to spend a lot of time reading in a classroom.

i could not believe there was never any kind of conversation in my school about how to provide more opportunities for students with disabilities. the education system was still looking for ways to keep the pressure on children's teachers to improve their grades, that they have to be teachers who were in the grade for eight years, and they weren't even being evaluated.

so why weren't parents or guardians concerned about whether their kids were being by this system, if they could not see their kids in a classroom that they could improve? why couldn't you say, "i think you need to improve your reading skills," right? and they certainly believed it when i pointed it out to them. it doesn't matter if you said, "you need to go to an optometry class, or to a teacher's camp