subject
English, 29.08.2019 18:00 vnzgirl

Which statement explains the change in the roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end of act 3.3?
a)the mob remains calm throughout both speeches.
b)the mob is angry immediately after brutus’ speech but becomes calm by mark antony’s support of the conspirators.
c)the mob weeps and cries throughout both speeches.
d)the mob remains calm and supportive after brutus’ speech but becomes enraged by mark antony’s wanting to rebel and kill the conspirators.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
Read the statement below then decided whether you agree or not. the story of j.r. simplot is a great american success story that anyone can admire
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Look at the prom for this unit was brutus a betrayer or a patriot and right one sentence statement of your claim then write two or three examples of counter claims to your argument divide specific examples for the play to support your clan use proper spelling an betrayer or a patriot and right one sentence statement of your claim then write two or three examples of counter claims to your argument divide specific examples for the play to support your clan use proper spelling an
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
How are montag and faber opposites of each other? a) montag is a firefighter, therefore it is his job to burn books. faber used to be and english professor, and it was his job to teach students about books. b) montag is passionate and determined, and farber is wise and cautious c) montag is brave enough to steal and illegal book. faber was too afraid to speak up when books started to become illegal. d) all of the answer choices are correct
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:50
[1] nothing that comes from the desert expresses its extremes better than the unhappy growth of the tree yuccas. tormented, thin forests of it stalk drearily in the high mesas, particularly in that triangular slip that fans out eastward from the meeting of the sierras and coastwise hills. the yucca bristles with bayonet-pointed leaves, dull green, growing shaggy with age like an old [5] man's tangled gray beard, tipped with panicles of foul, greenish blooms. after its death, which is slow, the ghostly hollow network of its woody skeleton, with hardly power to rot, makes even the moonlight fearful. but it isn't always this way. before the yucca has come to flower, while yet its bloom is a luxurious, creamy, cone-shaped bud of the size of a small cabbage, full of sugary sap. the indians twist it deftly out of its fence of daggers and roast the prize for their [10] own delectation why does the author use the words "bayonet-pointed" (line 4) and "fence of daggers" (line 9) to describe the leaves of the yucca tree? . to create an image of the sharp edges of the plant to emphasize how beautiful the plant's leaves are to explain when and where the plant grows to show how afraid the author is of the plant
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement explains the change in the roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end...
Questions
question
English, 22.05.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 22.05.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722367