What best defines the mode of narration in this excerpt from daisy miller by henry james?
the young lady inspected her nounces and smoothed her ribbons again, and winterbourne presently risked an observation upon the beauty of
the view. he was ceasing to be embarassed, for he had begun to perceive that she was not in the least embarrassed herself. there had not
been the slightest alteration in her charming complexion, she was evidently neither offended nor flattered. if she looked another way when he
spoke to her, and seemed not particularly to hear him, this was simply her habit, her manner. yet, as he talked a little more and pointed out some
of the objects of interest in the view, with which she appeared quite unacquainted, she gradually gave him more of the benefit of her glance, and
then he saw that this glance was perfectly direct and unshrinking. it was not, however, what would have been called an immodest glance, for the
young girl's eyes were singularly honest and fresh. they were wonderfully pretty eyes, and, indeed, winterboume had not seen for a long time
anything prettier than his fair countrywoman's various features-her complexion, her nose, her ears, her teeth. he had a great relish for feminine
beauty, he was addicted to observing and analyzing it and as regards this young lady's face he made several observations.
o a.
first person
ob.
third-person omniscient
o c. second person
od. third-person limited

B. third-person omniscient.

Explanation:

This is because the author describes the characters desires and wishes.

D.) Third-Person Limited

Explanation:

I just took the test on Plato, and it was D XD Good luck

the correct answer is the first one.

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.