subject
English, 08.07.2019 13:10 clarajeansonels9987

Which of the following is not indirect characterization?
question 7 options:
a. rainsford was a skilled and experienced hunter.
b. rainsford quietly determined what he had to do to survive the hunt.
c. ivan slowly trudged through the muck to retrieve the prey.
d. the general peered effortlessly through the foliage and looked for clues to track his prey.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 19:30
Read the opening lines of chapter 1 of twenty years at hull house and answer the question. on the theory that our genuine impulses may be connected with our childish experiences, that one’s bent may be tracked back to that “no-man’s land” where character is formless but nevertheless settling into definite lines of future development, i begin this record with some impressions of my childhood. the author begins her book with memories from her childhood. according to this excerpt, addams felt strongly that childhood was important because its trials and triumphs will support a successful life suffering during this time can create long-lasting goals it has a strong impact on personal growth throughout life children are free of the ethical judgments that adults make next question
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 21:30
Arrange the events in ivan ilyich's life, which are described in chapters 1–4 of leo tolstoy's the death of ivan ilyich, in chronological order. ivan ilyich becomes assistant public prosecutor, a position that he serves in for seven years. ivan ilyich meets zachar ivanovich in st. petersburg and receives a guaranteed appointment in the department of justice. ivan ilyich graduates from the school of law and qualifies for the tenth rank of the civil service. ivan ilyich becomes a public prosecutor and is transferred to another province. ivan ilyich is offered the post of examining magistrate in a russian province.
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:30
I’m cruel tribute which characters action most advance the development of the plot?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following is not indirect characterization?
question 7 options:
a. rainsf...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.04.2021 06:10
question
Biology, 17.04.2021 06:10
Questions on the website: 13722361