How are precedents used in majority opinions and dissents?
a. to review the decisions of lower courts on the same case, and to
then either refute or support those previous decisions
o
b. to support an argument by showing that because other courts
have made similar decisions, the decision in the current case must
be logical
o
c. to retry defendants of a case by looking for a different angle in
which to incriminate them
o
d. to write a thorough summary of a case by delineating all the facts
and circumstances surrounding the case

To support an argument by showing that because other courts have made similar decisions, the decision in the current case must be logical.

Explanation:

When precedents are used in majority opinions and dissents, this is done in order to support an argument. The argument is that, because in similar cases, other courts have made similar decisions, then the decision in the current case must also be logical. This provides support to a particular decision, as well as regularity to the law.

the answer is B

Explanation:

answer; /// i believe that the correct answer is ; ///fictional books or character' check first good luck

hi u can delete this