Read the excerpt below and answer the question that follows.

the fact is that intermarriage and interdining are not necessary factors in friendship and unity though they are
often emblems thereof. but insistence on either the one or the other can easily become and is to-day a bar to
hindu-mahomedan unity. if we make ourselves believe that hindus and mahomedans cannot be one unless
they interdine or intermarry, we would be creating an artificial barrier between us which it might be almost
impossible to remove. and it would seriously interfere with the flowing unity better hindus and
mahomedans if, for example, mahomedan youths consider it lawful to court hirou girls. the hindu parents
will not, even if they suspected any such thing, freely admit mahomedans to their homes as they have begun
to do now. in my opinion it is necessary for hindu and mahomedan young men to recognise this limitation
i hold it to be utterly impossible for hindus and mahomedans to intermarry and yet retain intact each other's
religion. and the true beauty of hindu-mahomedan unity lies in each remaining true to his own religion and
yet being true to each other. for, we are thinking of hindus and mahomedans even of the most orthodox
type being able to regard one another as natural friends instead of regarding one another as natural enemies
as they have done hitherto.

what does the excerpt do? use your notes about what the paragraph says from the previous section.