It may seem surprising that no confederate sympathizers took action against van lew, given her strong and public views on secession and slavery. surely there were suspicions, especially among her upper-crust neighbors, but the matter never went beyond those suspicions. historians have suggested that the secessionists were victims of their own cultural bias, believing that no aristocratic person, and certainly not a lady, would ever consider taking part in anything as impolite as spying. a true lady managed her servants, prepared parties and gatherings, and blindly supported her husband. such attitudes worked in van lew's favor, diverting suspicion from her.—the dark game, paul janeczkoafter reading the passage, answer these questions using the drop-down menus. what information develops the central idea? a. van lew was never accused of spying. b. van lew had strong views on secession. c. women were expected to host parties. why does the author include this information? a. it enhances understanding of spy techniques. b. it explains the cultural bias of the time. c. it complicates understanding of van lew's views. edit: its a & b