The enzyme dna polymerase works only in the 5′ to 3′ direction. how does this affect the leading strand and the lagging strand? a. dna polymerase can use only the leading strand as a template. a different enzyme is used to synthesize dna on the lagging strand. b. dna polymerase can work continuously on the leading strand but must flip the lagging strand around before it can work on it. c. dna polymerase can work on both the leading and the lagging strand but is much faster on the leading strand. d. dna polymerase can work continuously on the leading strand but works discontinuously on the lagging strand, creating okazaki fragments

a

Explanation:

im guessing

the answer would be D. DNA polymerase can work continuously on the leading strand but works discontinuously on the lagging strand, creating Okazaki fragments

Explanation:

write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrators’ schools and explain how their schools shape their perspectives toward the hijab. cite evidence from the text to support your ideas.

copy and paste answer:

two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrator's schools would be this, the one school with the veil is the one school were the students were forced to wear the veils, and they did not know why they had to wear the veils. the girl student writing the story was not like the other students, she didn't care. in the second school there was a lot of hostile activities going on throughout the school. most of the students were upset and this, including the author, but she was trying to look and the good side of things.  

overall, both schools had something that the students or most of the students did not like or appreciate. what you can learn from these stories is that life will never be exactly how you may want it to be. complaining about your lifestyle will only make matters worse or at least feel worse in the long run. that's happens to be the information you can interpret from these two stories.

answer: the first one

explanation:

explicitly is defined as “in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.” the rest are interpretive and not clearly proven leaving in fact possible “confusion or doubt” which explicitly, by definition cannot have.