Revise the sentence below on order to make them appropriate for an academic text.
the patient's not gonna see the doctor if he doesn't high tail to the hospital on time.

it is necessary to replace the informal expressions: gonna and  high tail

Explanation:

In order to make this sentence The patient's not gonna see the doctor if he doesn't high tail to the hospital on time, more appropriate for an academic text it is necessary to replace the informal expressions: gonna and  high tail.Furthermore, the contractions must not be used.

Here are two possible versions the first one a neutral style and the second one more formal.

1- if he does not rush to the hospital the patient will not be able to see the doctor.  

2-Should the patient have the wish to see the doctor on time, he must move with urgent haste.

The patient is not going to see the doctor If he does not high tail to the hospital on time.

Explanation:

It would be appropriate for an academic tex to avoid the abreviations because these show the reader that you are using informal language and when you want to write an academic text you must use formal language avoiding all kind of abreviations like the following:

-The patient's

-He doesn't

-Gonna

old english did not sound like modern english, which differs widely in phonology and especially in grammar, so taht old english is unintelligible to modern speakers.

the average english was strongly influenced by the anglo-norman as later by the anglo-french. the pronunciation was affected by the norman with the sounds   "/ θ / and / ð / " transcribed as th.

modern english was standarized from the london dialect and extended by the government and administartion as well as by the effects of printing, began to acquire more words from other languages as well to imporve in a more fluent pronunciation.

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.