Which is the least effective reason for why we write academic arguments about works of short fiction?
a) to get a good grade
b) to hone our thinking and powers of analysis
c) to cement the lessons offered by the authors
d) to practice for college and the workplace

B

Explanation:

It's asking for the LEAST effective. All of the other ones are reasons that we would actually write.

to leave the reader thinking and wandering on their own. without a resolution we are clueless to what happens next, and why it does. it may even cause suspension with the reader.

explanation:

an great real life example for the lottery principle is the real life lottery itself. it adheres to the lottery principle so much it's even called lottery. you apply for the lottery in the manner of getting a ticket and if you are lucky, the goods are distributed to you, in this case, the huge amounts of money. there are other real life example but this is the best one.