Why do you think that it is important for diplomats to understand the worldview of the other party?

Because instead of assuming that the other party is always wrong or ignorant, learning everyone else's perspectives will allow for a quicker consensus among each party and put the diplomats on track to better the people.  Having a gathering of ideas will be a more accurate representation of society as a whole, rather than just one sided perspectives.

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest

what are you