Annotation-can someone annotate this using rhetorical devices? i need it for tomorrow and i don't understand it

prince
where are the vile beginners of this fray?
prince
where are the evil men who started this fight?
benvolio
105o noble prince, i can discover all
the unlucky manage of this fatal brawl.
there lies the man, slain by young romeo,
that slew thy kinsman, brave mercutio.
benvolio
oh, noble prince, i can tell you everything about the unfortunate circumstances of this deadly fight. over there tybalt is lying dead. he killed your relative, brave mercutio, and then young romeo killed him.
lady capulet
tybalt, my cousin! o my brother’s child!
110o prince! o cousin! husband! oh, the blood is spilled
of my dear kinsman! prince, as thou art true,
for blood of ours shed blood of montague.
o cousin, cousin!
lady capulet
tybalt was my nephew! he was my brother’s son! oh prince, oh nephew, oh husband! oh, my nephew is dead! oh prince, as you are a man of honor, take revenge for this murder by killing someone from the montague family. oh cousin, cousin!
prince
benvolio, who began this bloody fray?
prince
benvolio, who started this fight?
benvolio
tybalt here slain, whom romeo’s hand did slay.
115romeo, that spoke him fair, bade him bethink
how nice the quarrel was and urged withal
your high displeasure. all this uttered
with gentle breath, calm look, knees humbly bowed,
could not take truce with the unruly spleen
120of tybalt deaf to peace, but that he tilts
with piercing steel at bold mercutio’s breast,
who, all as hot, turns deadly point to point,
and, with a martial scorn, with one hand beats
cold death aside and with the other sends
125it back to tybalt, whose dexterity,
retorts it. romeo, he cries aloud,
“hold, friends! friends, part! ” and, swifter than his tongue,
his agile arm beats down their fatal points,
and ’twixt them rushes—underneath whose arm
130an envious thrust from tybalt hit the life
of stout mercutio, and then tybalt fled.

The prince's first two lines are a use of amplification as he is repeating himself for emphasis. This makes the story more dramatic.

Benvolio uses epithet when he is mentioning that Mercutio is brave. This is because he is listing a quality Mercutio has and is saying it before his name.

Benvolio also seems to be repeating himself when he says noble prince once again when continuing with the details. He didn't have to repeat it over again but it adds emphasis to the story. He also repeats himself once again when describing what occurred but in a less poetic and more serious fashion.

Lady Capulet's grief also adds to the dramatic effect as she lists off the dead man's relations. This appears to be an anaphora when she says "O".

Once again, just like Benvolio has, she repeats what she said earlier except in a more easy to understand and less condensed form. This is only adding more emphasis.

Once again the prince asks what happened to Benvolio. He already asked this at the beginning but he is using more emphasis.

Benvolio speaks to him poetically. However, at the end of this line, it also describes the way he said it and how he postured himself in front of the prince. This is adding more onto the dialogue.

Beyond this point I don't get the rest sorry lol

the rhetorical devices that he used in "common sense" are syntax for his sentence structure and pathos for his emotion against the british unfairly treating the "americans" and logos of what documents that what happened to the pilgrims when they had the mayflower compact and how that the british were wanting to have one religion but the compact said for any religion to be accepted.

the hunger games, written by  suzanne collins, is fiction in the young adult genre, which is not my age group, but i found myself unable to put it down. its combination of nerve-racking tension, thrilling action, and engaging love story kept me up until the wee hours. i was surprised at how completely engrossing the plot was. like  brave new world, this story is set in a future where the government oppresses its people, but the book also borrows ideas from the greek myth of theseus and the minotaur.

divided into 12 districts, ruled by an oppressive government located at the  capitol. katniss everdeen, a 16-year-old girl from district 12, takes her younger sister’s place as one of 24 “tributes” selected every year to participate in the hunger games at the capitol.

while i found this book absolutely enthralling, i was surprised it was aimed at an audience of young adults. it seems extremely intense for anyone younger than 16 or 17. for example, there is a scene where one young tribute is slowly eaten alive by wolf-like creatures all night long, and katniss has to finally throw a weapon at him to end his misery. i found this a little too disturbing when i considered the age of the character.

the intensity of the action was something one would find in a more mature book, but the age of the characters and the simplicity of the prose were aimed at a much younger audience. in addition, this book was written in present tense, which i found annoying, but that’s more of a personal preference than a stylistic fault. it was also edited somewhat poorly, but that rarely distracted from the plot. for example, the author often spoke in sentence fragments to describe how katniss felt, which might have been an attempt to reflect on her thought process, but i found it disorienting to read a lot of really short sentences all together. it would have been better to vary the sentence length on occasion, but the story was still coherently.

overall,  the hunger games  was an excellent, enthralling read that i highly recommend. if it was more clearly marked for older teens, it would have been better, but it was a fantastic book with a wonderfully creative plot.

happy to .

pls mark as brainliest.