Respond to the following prompt in a 6–8 sentence paragraph. remember to use evidence from each text to support your response.

writers often use their texts to make a comment on society. think of a modern text (poem, story, novel, movie, or television show) that explores marriage. in what ways are the characters ollie mcgee from spoon river anthology, mrs. mallard from "the story of an hour," and the character from your modern text similar? how does each character feel about her marriage and about her husband? what is each writer saying about marriage through their characters?

Answer no 1:

Mrs. duck was additionally accusative her husband of abuse and felt free solely when her death when Ollie McGee only felt free after her death. They each felt cornered in their marriages. each lady really was free once they were both dead. They each didn't appreciate their marriages and felt as if they were robbed of straightforward freedoms. within the 19thand 20thcenturies ladies were thought of as property and also the highest bidder was to win them. These ladies were precisely that property to their husbands.

Answer no 2:

From the few details provided by the author, the wedding between Louise and Brently had not been sad. they're apparently higher bourgeoisie with Brently as some quite skilled man. Brently believed that Louise had to be watched and cared for thanks to her unhealthiness. Louise most likely would have delineated it as smothered and mothered. The reader learns that Louise is aware of that her husband loves her. Louise will have feelings for her husband. In fact, she states that typically she loves him and sometimes she doesn't. On the opposite hand, Brently apparently had complete management over Louise as she describes his "powerful can bending her." His intentions were to guard her; but, to Louise, it absolutely was against the law to impose one person's can on another person. In those late nineteenth century standards, their wedding was most likely typical. the person dominated the house and also the wedding. The woman's purpose was to require care of the house and serve the person altogether ways in which. The one issue that Louise is totally certain of is her need for freedom: from her wedding, from the confinement for her unhealthiness, to try to to no matter she wished. This she describes as a "monstrous joy" as a result of it comes from her husband's death however her complete happiness to be free.

Answer no 3:

"The Story of AN Hour" deals with the role of ladies in wedding, and this will replicate Chopin's own opinions on the plight of ladies in society with relevancy their roles in wedding. It will actually be seen that a she might need felt like her protagonist throughout her wedding. However, the Mrs. duck and Chopin's lives aren't precisely parallel. Chopin married a person WHO idolized her independence and had six youngsters, however the family strm,uggled financially. Oscar, Chopin's husband, wasn't a good supplier because of his poor business sense and later became sick, therefore it will be seen that Chopin might need felt cornered in her wedding with few choices obtainable to her. once laurels died, Chopin was in an excellent darker money state, and commenced writing to herald an financial gain. Chopin's feminine characters typically struggle with the expectations society places on ladies, and appear to echo Chopin's own feelings. it'd be fascinating to understand if she felt the relief that Mrs. duck will at the supposed death of her husband.

Chopin typically will write on freedom during a woman’s life and the way wedding will constrain that; but, this story shows freedom a touch otherwise. Women, the verbalizer implies, are capable of putting the identical burdens on their fellow creatures as men are. The “persistence” is “blind” in addition, suggesting it's AN innate quality concerning human behavior, not simply the behavior of men. typically, Chopin looks to privilege ladies in her stories just because they're way more fascinating to write down concerning than men.

returning points to main account

explanation:

explanation:

gay