The author presents the claim: the legend of king arthur-- in stark contrast to the actual man --is easy to track back to its origins.

which of the following best supports this claim?

question 18 options:

… it was the welsh who were descendants of the ancient britons.

these britons came to power after the fall of the roman empire, early in the fifth century.

when journalist theodore h. white, quoting from the musical, referred to the kennedy years as "one brief, shining moment," the president's administration was quickly labeled "camelot."

it was an englishman, thomas malory, whose fifteenth-century morte d'arthur combined all these elements, giving his countrymen a mythic tradition to match any nation's.

It was an Englishman, Thomas Malory, whose fifteenth-century Morte d'Arthur combined all these elements, giving his countrymen a mythic tradition to match any nation's.

The last option best supports the claim. It clearly states where the legend of King Arthur originated by saying that Thomas Malory combined all the elements of the story to create the tale "Morte D'Arthur". Option C explains an allusion to the legend of King Arthur. Option A and B give facts about the history of the Britons but don't actually say where the legend or the actual man originated.

answer: c

explanation:

to me i think class room sitting education is better. i do online school and i have not learned a think haha. when i sit in the classroom i just sit there and kind of pay attention but still i get so far ahead in the class when im doing online i have nothing else better to do but play video games and i sit in school and learn and have friends and just actually learn. when i'm doing online i sit here listing to music and get on and and look up the answers i guess that is my fault for being a cheater. but to be honest i think sitting in the classroom is better.