20 points for the best answer!
read the excerpt from chamberlain's address and answer the question that follows.

“my good friends, for the second time in our history, a british prime minister has returned from germany bringing peace with honour. i believe it is peace for our time.”

which sentence best describes the speaker's sentiment in this excerpt?

a. he has confidence in his decision.

b. he fears germany's continued aggression.

c. he is worried that people doubt his integrity.

d. he is relying on his friends to vindicate him.

The answer is A.

Chamberlain had absolute confidence in his peace deal with Hitler.

Spoiler alert: it didn't work out.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

the most appropriate strategy would be to do a questions and answer type speech.