Read this claim from an argumentative essay about high-sugar foods. high-sugar foods should have the same sales restrictions as other harmful substances, such as alcohol and tobacco. which piece of evidence, if true, would best support this claim? sugar is a natural source of energy for the body. it has been reported that the average child consumes over thirty teaspoons of sugar per day. consuming too much sugar over time can lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease. sugar is cheaper to buy than alcohol and tobacco.

The piece of evidence that would best support the claim is "Consuming too much sugar over time can lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease".

An argumentative essay is a piece of writing that presents the author's position on a certain topic in a clear way. It is made up of an introduction, body paragraphs and a conclusion and it includes a well-defined thesis statement in the first lines. This thesis statement must be supported with evidence in order to convince the reader to accept the author's claim. In this case, the piece of evidence that would best support the claim is "Consuming too much sugar over time can lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease" since it is factual evidence; in other words, it has been scientifically proven that the consumption of sugar can provoke diabetes and it supports the claim that sugar is bad for human beings' health.

The piece of evidence that would best support the claim is "Consuming too much sugar over time can lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease".

An argumentative essay is a piece of writing that presents the author's position on a certain topic in a clear way. It is made up of an introduction, body paragraphs and a conclusion and it includes a well-defined thesis statement in the first lines. This thesis statement must be supported with evidence in order to convince the reader to accept the author's claim. In this case, the piece of evidence that would best support the claim is "Consuming too much sugar over time can lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease" since it is factual evidence; in other words, it has been scientifically proven that the consumption of sugar can provoke diabetes and it supports the claim that sugar is bad for human beings' health.

An argumentative essay is a document in which a debatable issue is proposed and information and resources are used to support or repeal the position of the writer of the text. In this case, the issue regards whether the consumption and buying of sugar-rich foods should be restricted as heavily as is the use of substances as tobacco or alcohol. In general, it has been known that the consumption of sugar-rich foods has been increasing greatly, especially in the Western world and science has also discovered that this extreme consumption of so much refined sugar is increasing the appearance of more and more diseases, like diabetes and cardiovascular issues in the population. In fact, in the last years, the incidence of high-sugar-consumption-produced diseases, like diabetes, and also heart disease caused by obesity, has increased exponentially if compared to what it was 10 or 15 years ago. Although never as harmful as tobacco or alcohol, if this high intake of sugar continues without limitations, there won´t be more obese people, but also more people with obesity and cardiovascular diseases. The evidence that best supports the claim would be that consumption of too much sugar over time can lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease.  

An argumentative essay is a document in which a debatable issue is proposed and information and resources are used to support or repeal the position of the writer of the text. In this case, the issue regards whether the consumption and buying of sugar-rich foods should be restricted as heavily as is the use of substances as tobacco or alcohol. In general, it has been known that the consumption of sugar-rich foods has been increasing greatly, especially in the Western world and science has also discovered that this extreme consumption of so much refined sugar is increasing the appearance of more and more diseases, like diabetes and cardiovascular issues in the population. In fact, in the last years, the incidence of high-sugar-consumption-produced diseases, like diabetes, and also heart disease caused by obesity, has increased exponentially if compared to what it was 10 or 15 years ago. Although never as harmful as tobacco or alcohol, if this high intake of sugar continues without limitations, there won´t be more obese people, but also more people with obesity and cardiovascular diseases. The evidence that best supports the claim would be that consumption of too much sugar over time can lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease.  

it means that people are present over there who cares for us who loves us and we are never alone there is always a supporting hands behind us so never lose your hope and confidently move ahead to get success in your life.if you make mistakes there are people to make it correct

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.