Read this example. cherise was assigned to write a literary analysis of a book she read about the civil rights movement. cherise did not enjoy the book because it was confusing to her. she believed that it introduced characters without explaining who they were and that it jumped too quickly from event to event without giving enough description. cherise’s thesis statement for her literary analysis is "many different people were involved in the important events that started the civil rights movement.”

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

oooh~ i love the salem witch trials.

sadly though, i cannot you if you don't post the paragraph. i'm confused on what to write!

if you would kindly post the paragraph though, i'm more than happy to you.

(:     < 3

the answer is d)to persuade the troops that she is a capable commander