Ineed this done read this claim and evidence from the passage. claim: antibiotics are often prescribed to distressed patients even if the antibiotics are clearly not working. evidence: eli's ear infection did not respond to antibiotics. which statement best evaluates the relevancy and sufficiency of the evidence to this claim? the evidence is sufficient but not relevant. the evidence is neither relevant nor sufficient. the evidence is relevant but not sufficient. the evidence is both relevant and sufficient.

The answer is: The evidence is relevant but not sufficient.

The evidence is relevant enough to getting into an argument/ debate, and to question the claim, but it's not sufficient to win the claim. The claim is an statement in this case.

new york state wildlife expert richard thomas found that a woodchuck could   chuck around 35 feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. thomas reasoned that if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equivalent to the weight of the dirt, or 700 pounds.

c) by giving an example of how mary beth tinker did, in fact, disrupt her mathematics class

explanation:

petitioner john f. tinker, 15 years of age, and solicitor christopher eckhardt, 16 years of age, went to secondary schools in des moines, iowa.