If the story "two kinds" had been told through suyuan's point of view, what type of narration would be appropriate? first-person or third-person limited first-person or third-person omniscient second-person third-person omniscient

The answer is:  

First person or third person limited  

Explanation:

In third person limited the point of view the narrator is tethered to one character's thoughts and emotions at a time and as a result the narrator takes on  the qualities of this character's voice. In persona the narrator only knows and can only show what the character knows as well. The entire narrative is going to be filtered through this character's mind sometimes a third person limited can be so close that it's almost the same as a first person. This would prove beneficial for the short story Two Kinds. beneficial because a third person limited combines the cinematic quality of third-person omniscient and the intimacy of first-person. With Two Kinds by Amy Tan, it can also maintain mystery and uncertainty about secondary characters because the narrator doesn't know anything the character doesn't know.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

1. b

2. a deadly disease

4. at the same time

5. a) true

b) true

c)false?

d)false?

7. para.1 = c

para.2 = d

para.3 = f

para.4= b

para.5= e

para.6 = a