English, 25.06.2019 13:00 rachel693

Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. what is most likely the next step taken by the authors of the paper? they will change their research to a different topic and start all over again. they will alter the data to match the results that their peers were expecting. they will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper. they will sue the journal for not printing the paper and delaying their research.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: Annapetrik

The answer is option 3: They will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.

That is most likely the next step taken by the authors of the paper since the fact that they received the paper back with many comments does not mean that they have to give up with their research topic or alter the data. Actually, the comments from several fellow scientists that are attached to the paper are useful and should be considered as suggestions for improving the paper. Thus, the two scientists will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.

Answer from: Goldenstate32

The correct answer is “They will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.”

Indeed, one of the main principles that ensure the validity and reliability of the scientific method and publications is the notion of peer-review. Your work as a scientist has to be verifiable and reproducible by other scientists in order to make sure that you are not using flawed methodology, or faking your results to match your claims. If their paper was returned it was probably due to imperfections in their methodology or to contradictory or impossible to reproduce results and ethical scientists would take the observations of their peers very seriously and use them to strengthen their own research and reveal their conclusions, wherever they lead them to.

Answer from: Quest

to refer to another writer's ideas in the course of making your own original statement. when you use a summary in the course of your own writing, you must use your be used in book reviews (see chapter 8), in essays of analysis (see, nection between sentences, and you can create new paragraphs to reflect

Answer from: Quest

Both men foresaw the us as a great future power. however, they differed on the path the nation was to follow in achieving this role. while jefferson preferred an agrarian nation, hamilton favored an industrial and business intensive nation. as such, jefferson detested hamilton's idea of a strong federal government. jefferson wanted the bulk of power to rest with the states. these major views were behind polarizing washington's cabinet into two distinct factions. hamilton's followers became known as federalists and jefferson's democratic-republicans.

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 19:00

Based on the evidence provided, readers can conclude that trey is

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 21:40

Read the excerpt from "the most dangerous game." a man, who had been hiding in the curtains of the bed, was standing there. "rainsford! " screamed the general. "how in god's name did you get here? " "swam," said rainsford. "i found it quicker than walking through the jungle." the general sucked in his breath and smiled. "i congratulate you," he said. "you have won the game." rainsford did not smile. "i am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "get ready, general zaroff." the general made one of his deepest bows. "i see," he said. "splendid! one of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. the other will sleep in this very excellent bed. on guard, rainsford." . . he had never slept in a better bed, rainsford decided. adrian is writing an essay about "the most dangerous game.” which detail from the excerpt best supports his idea that rainsford is unchanged and still feels that the hunter is justified in killing the hunted? a man, who had been hiding in the curtains of the bed, was standing there. "swam," said rainsford. "i found it quicker than walking through the jungle." rainsford did not smile. "i am still a beast at bay," he said, in a low, hoarse voice. "get ready, general zaroff." he had never slept in a better bed, rainsford decided.

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 02:20

Summarize in 3-5 complete sentences the conditions of life on the reservation as depicted by chief red cloud’s speech. cite evidence from the text to support your answer.

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 05:40

To choose a good persuasive essay topic,begin with a big idea,narrow it down,and a.then narrow it down more; it is impossible to have a topic that is too narrow. b.do some research to see what you should write about c.specify-ask a question you want answered in your argument

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientif...

Questions