Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. what is most likely the next step taken by the authors of the paper? they will change their research to a different topic and start all over again. they will alter the data to match the results that their peers were expecting. they will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper. they will sue the journal for not printing the paper and delaying their research.

Option 3 is the correct one: They will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.

Since the comments that the two scientists received on their paper should be considered as ideas to improve the quality of their paper, they will consider those suggestions and incorporate them before resubmitting the paper.

This is most likely the next step taken by the two scientists that wrote the reserach paper.

i guess you are missing the idea that has to be supported, am i right?

in other words

to put it differently

for one thing

as an illustration

in this case

for this reason

to put it another way

that is to say

with attention to

by all means

important to realize

another key point

first thing to remember

most compelling evidence

must be remembered

point often overlooked

to point out

on the positive side

on the negative side

with this in mind

notably

including

like

to be sure

namely

chiefly

truly

indeed

certainly

surely

markedly

such as

especially

explicitly

specifically

expressly

surprisingly

frequently

significantly

particularly

in fact

in general

in particular

in detail

for example

for instance

to demonstrate

to emphasize

to repeat

to clarify

to explain

to enumerate