Which best explains the use of irony in the "piece of string"?

The answer is the second option: Master Hauchecorne, who is often deceitful, breaks down when people don't believe he is telling the truth.

The short story "The Piece of String", by Guy de Maupassant, revolves around the irony stated in the sentence above.

The main character, Master Hauchecorne, is accused of having found a pocket book containing some money inside it and is asked to return it. In reality, he has not found the pocket book, but a mere piece of string that he decided to pick up because he belives anything can be valuable if there is some use to it later on. While picking the string up, he's watched by an enemy of his, who becomes his accuser in the future.

Master Hauchercorne is a peasant, but a greedy one. His greediness is precisely what causes him trouble. Had he not decided to pick up such an unimportant object as the string, he would not have been accused of anything at all. When the truth is finally out and the pocket book is returned by someone else, people have a hard time believing Master Hauchecorne was innocent all along. His personality is well known by everyone. And he admits it himself that he would be capable of doing such a thing as picking the pocket book from the floor, in case he had had the chance:

He went home indignant, choking with rage, with confusion, the more cast down since with his Norman craftiness he was, perhaps, capable of having done what they accused him of and even of boasting of it as a good trick.

B). Master Hauchecorne, who is often deceitful, breaks down when people don't believe he is telling the truth.

Explanation:

The irony is the literary device, that represents a contrast between the literal meaning and the implied meaning of the play or to show the distinction between the expectations and reality. According to the question, the short story "piece of string" best explains the use of irony in option B as stated above as the entire story revolves around this irony. Master Hauchecorne was a bit greedy who picked up mere "a piece of string" for which he was accused wrongly of having a book with money as he was witnessed by his enemies and people were unable to believe that he was telling the truth that breaks him down. The peasant's greed left him in this ironical situation.

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

yyhfg

explanation:

jhjbhvhb