Why is an apprentice narrator appropriate for describing world war i? the narrator’s growth can contrast naive views with the harsh realities of war. the narrator is able to explain why war is always necessary despite its enormous costs. in his blindness to reality, the narrator represents the majority of war’s proponents. an exemplar narrator would give nothing but wise speeches, which would get boring.

Hello!

In linguistics, we recognise 4 types of arguments, and two of them are experience, and examples; therefore, in this case, correct answer is: The Narrators growth can contrast naive views with the harsh realities of war.

Hope this helps

An apprentice narrator could be appropriate for describing World War I mainly because he/she could be an impartial party on this issue.

The fact that this narrator is not inclined to any part, or doesn't have a vast experience, gives he/she the necessary objective point of view to narrate the facts in the most credible way.

He/she could make use of all specific details to support the narration of facts in a very well documented way, assuring therefore a very adjusted issue.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

samuel gompers was an extremely important person in the american labor movement, being him an employee all his life he devoted himself to fight for the rights of his pairs, he believed they all had the right to have better thing and that they all were working for them but the factory workers were greedy, ambitions and socialist people for him who he didn't have a good concept of.

he gave so many speeches and led so many strikes and protest to fight for equality which he considered employers didn't want to accept, so he had an absolutely negative opinion of them.