John ruskin in his essay "work," claims that doctors value curing the sick more than money, and offers the following reason in support of his claim. [doctors] in the whole, desire to cure the sick; and-if they are good doctors, and the choice were fairly put to them- would rather cure their patient and lose their fee than kill him and get it. which best evaluates the support ruskin offers for his claim? a. it is logical; most people don't want to become doctors just for the sake of money b. it s logical; most people-- not just doctors-- would choose to save a life rather than kill someone and be paid c. its not logical; the author ignores other possibilities that the patient is cured and the doctor still gets his fee for example d. it is not logical; the author himself is not a doctor, so he does not have the expertise necessary to qualify his opinion.