subject
English, 27.06.2019 16:30 natalie2sheffield

Read the passage from animal farm. all the men were gone except one. back in the yard boxer was pawing with his hoof at the stable-lad who lay face down in the mud, trying to turn him over. the boy did not stir. "he is dead,” said boxer sorrowfully. "i had no intention of doing that. i forgot that i was wearing iron shoes. who will believe that i did not do this on purpose? ” "no sentimentality, comrade! ” cried snowball from whose wounds the blood was still dripping. "war is war. the only good human being is a dead one.” "i have no wish to take life, not even human life,” repeated boxer, and his eyes were full of tears. which key details does orwell include to support the central idea that snowball is ruthless? select tao options. -"boxer was pawing with his hoof at the stable-lad who lay face down in the mud, trying to turn him over." -β€œβ€˜he is dead,’ said boxer sorrowfully. β€˜i had no intention of doing that.’” -β€œβ€˜no sentimentality, comrade! ’ cried snowball from whose wounds the blood was still dripping.” -"war is war. the only good human being is a dead one.” -β€œβ€˜i have no wish to take life, not even human life,’ repeated boxer, and his eyes were full of tears.”

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Select the choice which features correct pronoun-antecedent agreement. es a) both of the boys had his shoes on. b) both of the boys had its shoes on. 9) neither of the boys had his shoes on. d) neither of the boys had their shoes on.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:20
Which of these names would be listed first in a telephone directory? a: d’agostino b: dague c: dagy
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
I’ve given a lot of thought to what one of them should be, and the answer seems clear.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the passage from animal farm. all the men were gone except one. back in the yard boxer was pawi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.10.2020 16:01
question
History, 05.10.2020 16:01
question
Mathematics, 05.10.2020 16:01
question
Mathematics, 05.10.2020 16:01
question
Mathematics, 05.10.2020 16:01
Questions on the website: 13722363