Read ahmad's argument in favor of changing the minimum driving age from 16 to 15. every year, millions of teenagers look forward to the freedom of earning their driver's license. it has been proven over time that teenagers are fully responsible by the time they are 15, and making teens wait until they are 16 to obtain a driver's license is wrong. many teenagers play sports, work jobs, and have an active social life when they are 15. it would be beneficial to the functioning of society if these people were able to independently drive themselves around. parents agree, too. most people believe that the streets would be safer if the minimum driving age were reduced to 15. what is the best evaluation of ahmad's reasoning? it is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning. it is logical because it stays on topic. it is illogical because it shows no bias. it is logical because it gives true statistics.

The correct answer is: it is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning.

Ahmad's argument is considered illogical because they used overgeneralization, a common type of faulty reasoning. Overgeneralization is the act of drawing a conclusion from very little data. In one of the generalizations, they state, "most people believe that the streets would be safer if the minimum driving age were reduced to 15." This is a broad assumption. How was this proven? There are no facts to support the statements.

i just took the test and A.) It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning. is correct

the answer should be d) he was one of those young thousands who greeted the war with a certain amount of relief, welcoming the liberation from webs of tangled emotion" since it is the best option because it shows his desire to free himself. 

hope this answer you! have a great day.

c -invasion by the moroccans.