On what basis should a reader evaluate evidence for effectiveness? select three options. a) similarity to the reader’s views b) relevance to the central idea c) connection to one part of the claim d) sufficiency to support the purpose e) credibility of the source

ANSWER:

B ) Relevance to the central idea

D ) Sufficiency to support the purpose

E ) Credibility of the source

We can use the process of elimination to achieve this answer.

It isn't A as readers' views are just their opinions which can be influenced by bias, they aren't the definitive facts. Therefore, similarities to the readers' views doesn't demonstrate anything or show how effective the evidence is. Hence, it can't be Option A.

It isn't Option C as it shouldn't be solely based on one part of the claim but instead the whole claim. This means that it could be connected to one part of the claim but then can contradict or oppose other parts of the claim. Therefore, it wouldn't be able to show how effective the evidence is. Hence, it can't be Option B.

Hope this helps! <3

Googly eyed because it sounds like a silly thing to call someone