Why do authors use causal relationship in play’s

I believe authors use casual relationship in plays because its a logical pattern, where a clear action (cause) has a reaction (effect).

Most of these patterns happen to show how the main character has emotional reaction perhaps through dialog, gesture, expression, or physical sensation. The character makes a decision on what to do next. The character are goes through events that reveal motivation setting impact, conflicts.

these are the reasons why authors use casual relationship in play's

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

i think the answer is restaurants offering only dinner