Someone my essay is due tomorrow does this make sense or do have to think of some new claims and counterclaim? if it does make sense can someone me find some sources? topic: is society too dependent on technology? introduction: it's almost impossible for any household not to have any sort of technology. whether its a phone, or even something as basic as a blender, technology surrounds us in our daily lives. but has technology taken over our lives, and do we over rely on them? these technologies can be exploited or modified to cause harm to the user, expose important or private information. this can also lead to a community struggle during a crisis such as a blackout.

I think it makes perfect sense. I would include myself that we are implementing objects into our life most of us don't even understand, which makes us more vulnerable to not only over relying but taking it for granted.

the rhetorical technique most used in this excerpt is parallelism. parallelism is a technique which author used in sentence as substitute of repeated synthetical similarities. it is the effect of rhetorical technique.

explanation:

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.