Click on each incorrect pronoun, and type the correct pronoun in the text box. check your spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and spacing, when my twin brother and me had a birthday, mom would bake us a cake. (the choice of cake was our's, but ted and me always wanted chocolate.) anyhow, grandma would come over and maybe some friends and cousins. they'd sing happy birthday to ted and i, we'd blow out the candles, and everyone would have cake and ice cream. birthdays are a lot different today. the four-year-old boy who lives in the apartment above our's had a chuck e. cheese party. him and several friends went to a chuck e. cheese restaurant where they had pizza, prizes, and a clown. a friend's daughter had a theme party when she turned seven. the choice of party theme was her's: dress up, tea time, ballerina, disney, or beach. once that decision was made, the professional party planner took over, at a cost of $25 per child. someone else gave his child a scuba diving birthday party—in a heated pool, of course. apparently, children compete by using their parties. they are afraid that friends won't come to their's if the parties are not unusual enough. between you and i, this extravagance isn't healthy. giving them kinds of parties can't be teaching children good values.

The "me" is sentence 1 should be "I". The "our's" in the parentheses should be "ours", and the "me" should be "I" again. The "I" in the 2nd sentence after the parentheses should be "me". The "our's" in the 4th sentence after the parentheses should be "ours". In the sentence after, the "him" should be "he". In the sentence "The choice of party theme was her's", the "her's" should be "hers". And, in the sentence "They are afraid that friends won't come to their's if...", the "their's" should be "theirs". Finally, the "I" in the second to last sentence should be "me".

d. murder of a son and cooking the son for a feast

procne murdered her son and served him to tereus, her husband and her son's father. she did this out of revenge. tereus raped her sister, philomela, and cut her tongue out to keep her from talking. philomela managed to communicate it to procne and procne sought revenge.

tantalus murdered his son and fed him to the gods because he was angry with the gods. the gods punished him by putting him in a pool of water that evaporates when he tries to drink and having fruit hang just out of his reach.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this