"the contest" uses a limited narrator—a third-person narrator who reveals restricted information through a single character at a time. the narration follows policles at first and then switches to nero and his assistant platus at the end of the story. what are the effects of this narrative change on the story?

The switch in the narration emphasizes the contrast between Nero's high opinion of his musical ability and the opinion of a competent observer. Despite Policles's forceful manner, we value his viewpoint because he is passionate about music, a gifted singer, and doesn’t realize Nero is the emperor. When the narration follows Policles, we see how repulsive Nero is as a singer and a person. The narration emphasizes how unjust and ridiculous the contest was and shows that power matters most under many circumstances.

When the narration follows Nero and Platus, we get a glimpse of Nero's extreme conceit. We're also left with a sense that it would be impossible for anyone to change his opinion. Instead, the people around Nero make extraordinary efforts to pretend they share his inaccurate views. This view of Nero and Platus reveals another theme of the story: people can irrationally justify almost anything. Also, this narrative view supports the audience’s false applause for Nero as well as Policles's chaotic escape.

in my opinion, anyone should be allowed to marry as long as it's not going against any laws. though i kind of contradict myself because i know that in some states and countries, gay marriage isn't legal yet- hopefully you get my point.

you want someone else to write your essay?