Edit: i don't need on this anymore, but you can still put something (it doesn't even have to be an answer) to  get the points. i don't want them going to waste. you. hello there, i need a little bit of reviewing this claim that i constructed. any recommended chances would be appreciated! here's my claim: "any respectable, dignified man or women wouldn’t trouble oneself about the money they make. rather, they would care for the work they did in good faith. "

Part a: what tone does dr. king use in his argument? question 3 options: assertive passive adoring angry

0313hethis excerpt was written by olaudah equiano, anwhat is the primary purpose of this passage? enslaved african who was taken to barbados. read thepassage, then answer the question.o to create sympathy for enslaved workerstheir huts, which ought to be well covered, and the place ! o to demonstrate a typical day of labor on a plantationdry where they take their little repose, are often opensheds, built in damp places, so that when the pooro to compare the living conditions of plantationowners and enslaved workerscreatures return tired from the toils of the field, theycontract many disorders, from being exposed to theto show ways housing on plantations could havedamp air in this uncomfortable state.been improved-sugar changed the world,marc aronson and marina budhosintrodone

Hamlet is often called a tragic hero who is torn between thought and action. why does he not kill claudius when he sees him in act iii, scene iii? why does he kill polonius in act iii, scene iv? how do these two actions affect your understanding of hamlet as a man of thought or a man of action? your answer should be at least 250 words.