Can someone   need asap  explain your views of mary shelley’s decision to frame the story as she does: with robert walton’s narrative bookending the story told by victor frankenstein. does this framing device improve the story or detract from it? how? in what ways does walton’s character serve as a stand-in or surrogate for readers? in what ways are his views and reactions colored by his personal background and circumstances? describe the ways in which the novel met or did not meet your expectations. how were both victor frankenstein and the monster he created different in shelley’s novel than in other interpretations or adaptations of the frankenstein story that you’ve encountered? explain any elements of the novel that you found surprising in terms of its treatment of characters, events, and themes.