How do I write this into two arguments where the conclusion of one is a premise to the other? I need 5 atomic sentences. Your justification of induction is not good. To see why, note that, if your justification ofinduction is good, it must be an argument that induction is reliable. But if it is such anargument, it must be either deductive or inductive. The former case is impossible. Sonow we have this: if your justification of induction is good, it must be an inductiveargument that induction is reliable. But if it is such an argument, it is a circularargument (in that it uses induction to justify induction itself) and, hence, it is not agood justification.

Liquid flows at steady state at a rate of 2 lb/'s through a pump, which operates to raise the elevation of the liquid 100 ft from control volume inlet to exit. the liquid specific enthalpy at the inlet is 40.09 btu/lb and at the exit is 40.94 btub. the pump requires 3 btu/s of power to operate. if kinetic energy effects are negligible and gravitational acceleration is 32.174 tt/s, the heat transfer rate associated with this steady state process is most closely 1)-2,02 btu/s from the liquid to the surroundings 2)-3.98 btu/s from the surroundings to the liquid. 3)-4.96 btu/s from the surroundings to the liquid. 4)-1.04 btu/s from the liquid to the surroundings.