The following two algorithms are designed to find the minimum value in a list of integers. Create a variable min, and set this to the first value in the list. Compare each
Algorithm subsequent value in the list against the value of min, and if it is smaller than
1: or equal to the current value, set min to this value. When the end of the list
is reached, display the value of min
Create a variable min , and set this to 0. Compare each value in the list
Algorithm
against the value of min, and if it is smaller than the current value, set min to
11:
this value. When the end of the list is reached, display the value of min.
Which of the following statements correctly demonstrates that the two algorithms are
NOT equivalent?
Neither algorithm will correctly display the minimum value of the list [0, 5, 6, 2]
Algorithm I will correctly display the minimum value of the list [4, 10, 6, 1],but Algorithm II
will not
Algorithm Il will correctly display the minimum value of the list (-4, 2, 3, 2) but Algorithm
will not
Both algorithms will correctly display the minimum value of the list [-1, 3, -4, 8]

1. the seasons of the world

answer; always; never;

hey! im not 100 percent sure but im pretty sure that what you want to do is not possible : (

explanation:

the benefits of raising bc’s minimum wage to $15 through a

series of pre-announced staged increases far outweigh the likely

costs. claims that such an increase will lead to massive job losses

in low-wage sectors of the economy are not credible.

• an increase to $15 would result in some job losses. however,

the likely impact is less than a 1 per cent reduction in the overall

provincial employment rate, and a 7.6 per cent reduction in the

employment rate for those currently making between $10.25

and $15 per hour.

• the large job loss impacts predicted by some opponents of

minimum wages misrepresent the existing economic research. in

reading and using that research, it is important to recognize that

estimates showing job loss effects of minimum wage increases

apply only to teenagers. estimated effects for young adult and

adult workers range from insignificant to non-existent.

• focusing on teenage workers plays up an inaccurate stereotype

about who earns very low wages in bc and leads to exaggerated

claims about job losses. only 26 per cent of those currently making

between $10.25 and $12 are teenagers, and only 5 per cent

of those making between $12 and $15 are teenagers.